Identification of Hox genes and their expression profiles during embryonic development of the emerging model organism, Macrobrachium olfersii.

Hox genes encode transcription factors that specify the body segment identity during development, including crustaceans, such as amphipods and decapods, that possess a remarkable diversity of segments and specialized appendages. In amphipods, alterations of specialized appendages have been obtained using knockout experiment of Hox genes, which suggests that these genes are involved in the evolution of morphology within crustaceans. However, studies of Hox genes in crustaceans have been limited to a few species. Here, we identified the homeodomain of nine Hox genes: labial (lab), proboscipedia (pb), Deformed (Dfd), Sex combs reduced (Scr), fushi tarazu (ftz), Antennapedia (Antp), Ultrabithorax (Ubx), abdominal-A (abdA), and Abdominal-B (AbdB), and evaluated their expression by RT-qPCR and RT-PCR in the ovary, during embryonic development, and at the first larval stage (Zoea I) of the decapod Macrobrachium olfersii. The transcript levels of lab, Dfd, and ftz decreased and transcripts of pb, Scr, Antp, Ubx, abdA, and AbdB increased during embryonic development. Hox genes were expressed in mature ovaries and Zoea I larval stages, except Scr and ftz, respectively. In addition, isoforms of Dfd, Scr, Ubx, and abdA, which have been scarcely reported in crustaceans, were described. New partial sequences of 87 Hox genes from other crustaceans were identified from the GenBank database. Our results are interesting for future studies to determine the specific function of Hox genes and their isoforms in the freshwater prawn M. olfersii and to contribute to the understanding of the diversity and evolution of body plans and appendages in Crustaceans.

Atavisms in the avian hindlimb and early developmental polarity of the limb.

BACKGROUND: The naturally occurring chicken mutant talpid2 (ta2 ), best known for its limb and craniofacial defects, has long served as a valuable tool for developmental biologists studying growth and patterning of craniofacial structures and the limb. The mutant provides a unique tool to examine the molecular and cellular processes regulating limb development. RESULTS: This mutant also provides unique insights into the evolution of developmental genetic programs. Previous work defined the appearance of atavistic dentition in ta2 embryos. Herein we describe the appearance of ancestral characters of the hindlimb in embryonic ta2 chicken embryos. CONCLUSION: As the ta2 phenotype arises as a result of mutation in C2CD3 and disrupted cilia function, this mutant provides genetic and developmental insight into the causes of asymmetry in the limb and also a model for the evolution of the avian hindlimb.

Duplication and expression of Sox genes in spiders.

BACKGROUND: The Sox family of transcription factors is an important part of the genetic 'toolbox' of all metazoans examined to date and is known to play important developmental roles in vertebrates and insects. However, outside the commonly studied Drosophila model little is known about the repertoire of Sox family transcription factors in other arthropod species. Here we characterise the Sox family in two chelicerate species, the spiders Parasteatoda tepidariorum and Stegodyphus mimosarum, which have experienced a whole genome duplication (WGD) in their evolutionary history. RESULTS: We find that virtually all of the duplicate Sox genes have been retained in these spiders after the WGD. Analysis of the expression of Sox genes in P. tepidariorum embryos suggests that it is likely that some of these genes have neofunctionalised after duplication. Our expression analysis also strengthens the view that an orthologue of vertebrate Group B1 genes, SoxNeuro, is implicated in the earliest events of CNS specification in both vertebrates and invertebrates. In addition, a gene in the Dichaete/Sox21b class is dynamically expressed in the spider segment addition zone, suggestive of an ancient regulatory mechanism controlling arthropod segmentation as recently suggested for flies and beetles. Together with the recent analysis of Sox gene expression in the embryos of other arthropods, our findings support the idea of conserved functions for some of these genes, including a potential role for SoxC and SoxD genes in CNS development and SoxF in limb development. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides a new chelicerate perspective to understanding the evolution and function of Sox genes and how the retention of duplicates of such important tool-box genes after WGD has contributed to different aspects of spider embryogenesis. Future characterisation of the function of these genes in spiders will help us to better understand the evolution of the regulation of important developmental processes in arthropods and other metazoans including neurogenesis and segmentation.